Rails update attributes not validating

10-Jun-2017 06:33

(Wroclaw or Remote) Ready to join a a fast-paced, high-growth technology company and help us to improve our best–in-industry solutions.Active Model validations in Rails are awesome, but what happens when your UI doesn’t exactly match your data model?Rails provide a wide range of options for creating rich forms for your models.This can be a simple form for one object, or the form for many related objects. If you are not familiar with such terms as form_for or accepts_nested_attributes_for, I strongly recommend taking a look at this article Complex Rails Forms with Nested Attributes, written by Xavier Shay, which will show your how you can create complex forms with Rails.Suppose, we have a model called The problem here is that accepts_nested_attributes_for call destroy for child objects AFTER validation of the parent object. Of course, later, when the user will try to edit a company, he/she will get an error - “Company should have at least one office.”.), and it actually works, but again, it does not take into account the fact that some of the records may be marked for destruction. To sort out the problem, we need to understand what # accepts_nested_attributes_for generates for us this method def offices_attributes=(attributes) # @note the name of the method to call may vary depending on the type of association # @see https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activerecord/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb#L285 assign_nested_attributes_for_collection_association(:offices, attributes, mass_assignment_options) end def assign_nested_attributes_for_collection_association ... call_reject_if(association_name, attributes) # if the record passed # update a record with the attributes or marks it for destruction assign_to_or_mark_for_destruction(existing_record, attributes, options[:allow_destroy], assignment_opts) end ...

One approach to handling implementing this is to rely solely on client validations, but I .

do validates :pet_type, presence: true, inclusion: validates :dog_type, presence: true, if: "pet_type === 'dog'" validates :cat_type, presence: true, if: "pet_type === 'cat'" endwith_options if: :pet_friendly?

do validates :pet_type, presence: true, inclusion: validates :dog_type, presence: true, unless: "pet_type === 'cat'" validates :cat_type, presence: true, unless: "pet_type === 'dog'" endwhich gives me 2 conditions or a validation in a pretty clean and understandable way.

Then we’ll need more information such as bedrooms, bathrooms, parking spaces, yard, jacuzzi, etc…

rails update attributes not validating-19

is hunter hayes dating anyone

We don’t want to put this on one giant form because giant forms are a turn-off.

This is incredibly powerful and is extremely helpful when the state or your model depends on the presence of certain data.

Jun 10, 2016. Rails 5 supports update method on an ActiveRecordRelation object that runs callbacks and validations on all the records in the relation. people = Person.wherecountry 'US'. For simplicity let's add a validation that note_text field cannot be blank for first three records. class Note ApplicationRecord.… continue reading »

Read more

Dec 4, 2008. But an admin should be allowed to change some attributes on the user without setting the password. Because of the constraint imposed by this validation, what happens a lot of time is this user.some_flag = true user.savefalse. If you're not familiar with savefalse, it saves the record without running.… continue reading »

Read more

I want to think about publishing an article as an action, not a state the article is in, so setting and checking an attribute isn't the right answer. Not too bad! The only weird thing is having to use save instead of update in the publish method. That happens because update can't take a validation context as a parameter. Maybe.… continue reading »

Read more